3dmark time spy benchmark scores full#
3dmark time spy benchmark scores for windows 10#

It's offering serious performance with a level of efficiency I'm definitely here for. Though if I'd rigorously stuck to that advice throughout my career I wouldn't have a lot of published work by now.Īnyways, depending on how these Radeon machines are priced, the RX 7800M XT could be the GPU you want at the heart of your next gaming laptop. Its laptop chip nomenclature is almost impenetrable (you need a goddam coding wheel, ffs) and the graphics card names really don't tell you much of the story either.īut, my mother told me that if you don't have something nice to say, don't say anything. Though it's the same deal with the RX 7700M and RX 7800S, but the less said about AMD's current naming conventions the better. That RX 7900S looks a bit of an oddity in there, given that it is the same essential spec as the RX 7800M XT, but with a lower power profile.

3dmark time spy benchmark scores full#

The full rumoured line-up of mobile Radeon chips are: For reference, that Time Spy score is only just shy of the average GPU score of an RTX 4080 laptop chip (which is closer to an RTX 4070 Ti desktop part) which looks like a great result to me. Still, sticking with the mobile side of things, it bodes well for the gaming chops of AMD-powered notebooks. And that's not a great look in terms of generational performance uplifts.

3dmark time spy benchmark scores for windows 10#

If the red team can't significantly boost the clock speed with more power on the desktop then we would just be looking at an RX 7800 XT that performs like… well, an RX 6800 XT. 3DMark Time Spy is a DirectX 12 benchmark test for Windows 10 gaming PCs. The middle-order of Radeon cards has been conspicuous by its absence, with rumours suggesting performance isn't where AMD wanted. 3DMark Time Spy Graphics Score Performance 3DMark rank 24 MSRP Price 499 DirectX 12. We've so far only had the RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT cards at the high-end, with their somewhat hobbled Navi 31 chip, and the low-spec RX 7600 with its Navi 33 GPU. Not the 3GHz+ numbers we were given to expect from the Radeon RX 7000-series chips anyway. Certainly our current experience of RDNA 3 chips-either in monolithic or chiplet trim-haven't shown a particular aptitude for nailing super high clock speeds. That's a heavy 'should', however, and there's no guarantee that chucking more juice through the Navi 32 GPU will actually yield a whole heap more performance in a desktop GPU. That should translate to good desktop performance if, as expected, the RX 7800 XT comes with the same essential GPU makeup, but with a higher clock speed and moar power.